Once in a while.

Politics. I don’t usually like to go there. I do, sometimes. Against my will, I am willing to go there. There are things in politics, like there in other places, that require a different set of lenses. I wear glasses.

The electoral pulls show that, if we were to vote for a new President of the United States today, Mr Biden wouldn’t stand a chance against Mr Trump. The only person that could compete against Trump is Mr Kennedy. But he doesn’t stand a chance against Mr Biden; the Dems won’t let him run. On the other hand, the only one (between Trump and De Santis) that could lose against Mr Biden is Mr De Santis. The Dems like him because Biden would have a chance to win. But, for the opposite reason, he doesn’t have a chance to win against Trump. In fact, as much as the Republicans are kind of agnostic about Mr Trump, they don’t to lose.

The similarities between Trump and Kennedy are louder than the similarities between Trump and De Santis. The similarities between Biden and De Santis are louder than the similarities between Biden and Kennedy.

That’s why the discourse would be more intriguing and thought-provoking

Similarities have an opportunity to become differences more than discrepancies have an opportunity to become similarities. Differences are quiet, colorless, uneventful. They tend to generate high-pitched sounds only because they have nothing to say. Similarities are outspoken, spiteful in spite of their bizarre nature; they are more equivocal than differences.

Similarities feed themselves with nuances. Nuances are enthusiastic and playful. Lights, not highlights. Thanks.